Proof of EdgeMissiles fell and the airspace stayed open. Q had read the resolution rules.
The market priced a closure at 49.5%. Q put it at 12%. Iranian missiles tested the call in June, and the airspace stayed open.
Probability Israel closes its airspace by June 30, %
The first Iranian bombardment of Israel since the ceasefire that began in early April. The market jumped from 11.5% to 35.5% on the day.
Israel absorbed the barrage with ground stops and passenger caps, and kept flying: the thesis mechanism, observed. The market fell back to 23.5%.
Trump announced an emerging memorandum of understanding with Iran after a call with Netanyahu. Closure risk collapsed: the market fell from 40.5% to 15% and kept falling.
Sources reviewed
Reviewed 246 citations for this market. The call rests on the operational aviation record, OPSGROUP's Middle East airspace picture and EASA's conflict-zone bulletin, read against Israeli press coverage.
Primary record: OPSGROUP and EASA operational bulletins.
How Q tested it
Q tracked what would have to happen for Israel to actually close its airspace. The June barrages tested it, and none of it triggered.
| Break condition | Why it mattered | Result |
|---|---|---|
| A barrage overwhelms localized management | Enough incoming fire would force a blanket shutdown. This was the market's YES case. | Tested June 7 to 10, held |
| Israel reverts to the early-war closure playbook | Earlier phases of the war saw sweeping closures at the onset of hostilities. | Not observed |
| A closure that meets the market's bar | Resolution required a broad shutdown across most civilian airspace. Ground stops and delays did not qualify. | Resolved NO |
Quotient Signals is research and information, not financial advice. Markets involve risk, and past performance does not guarantee future results.