Proof of EdgeQ stayed between 2% and 5% while uranium deal headlines moved the market.
The market traded $20.5 million and moved with each round of uranium deal news. Q’s forecasts stayed focused on the physical constraints and the May 31 deadline.
Probability the US obtains Iranian enriched uranium by May 31, %
The 21-hour Islamabad session collapsed. Iran explicitly rejected the US demand to retrieve its enriched uranium.
Mediators insisted the door was not closed. Reports the US asked Iran to freeze enrichment for 20 years lifted the odds to their April 17 peak.
The Iranian Foreign Ministry explicitly denied any nuclear-transfer agreement, killing the rumor at the peak.
Sources reviewed
Reviewed 114 citations across 43 distinct sources.
Includes satellite-imagery assessment, arms-control analysis, and wire coverage.
What Q saw
Q read the physical timeline. Iran sealed the tunnel entrances at Isfahan with soil and debris on March 18, so a forcible recovery meant a multi-week military excavation. Even an agreed transfer required weeks of logistics, and blockade pressure takes months to become coercive. Iran’s position was explicit refusal. The market kept pricing diplomatic headlines. The calendar could not clear.
How Q tested it
Q tracked every path that could put the uranium in US hands before the deadline. None of them could clear in time.
| Break condition | Why it mattered | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Iran accepts a handover in negotiations | A diplomatic transfer agreement was the fastest path to YES before May 31. | Rejected at Islamabad |
| The US seizes the stockpile by force | Military custody would satisfy the resolution criteria directly. | Blockade chosen instead |
| A third party takes custody | Uranium moved to Russia or the IAEA could arguably trigger possession. | Trump rejected Putin’s offer |
Quotient Signals is research and information, not financial advice. Markets involve risk, and past performance does not guarantee future results.